Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

Description

Hardcover:
544 pages
Publisher:
The New Investigation (2010)
Language:
English
ISBN-10:
0615412564
ISBN-13:
978-0615412566
Product Dimensions:
10.1 x 7.3 x 1.4 inches
Shipping Weight:
3.4 pounds
If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is
the only
comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine
what
happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal
qui tam
(whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.
This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal
qui tam
case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).
This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened.  But for the record, I do not believe that our government
is
responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government
is not
responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.
This is not a case of
belief
. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1)
WHAT
happened, then
2)
HOW
it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3)
WHO
did it. And only then can we address
4)
WHY
they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to
(legally)
convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on
belief
. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told
who
did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to
who
committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or
how
they did so. But without addressing
what
happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than
conspiracy theory
, a phrase that also describes the
19 bad guys with box cutters story
we were given
before
noon on 9/11/01.
My own research is
not
speculation. It is a forensics investigation of
what
happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. I don’t address
who
did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine
what
happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with
conspiracy
theory of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called
9/11 truth movement
) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to my research. On the other hand, to determine
what
happened, we must address
all
of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring
who
did what or
how
they did it before they have determined
what
was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, “
9/11 was an inside job
,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “
19 bad guys with box cutters did it
.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies
what
crime was committed or
how
it was committed.
What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine
what
happened.
If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened.
If you don’t know what happened, keep listening to the evidence until you do.
The evidence always tells the truth.
The key is not to allow yourself to be distracted away from seeing what the evidence is telling you.